Mechanically stabilized earth (mse) retaining wall employing geosynthetic strip with plastic pipe(s) around steel rod

ABSTRACT

Disclosed are various embodiments of a mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) retaining wall that employ, for reinforcement, a geosynthetic strip that attaches to the MSE retaining wall and extends into the backfill soil. In one embodiment, the MSE retaining wall has at least one concrete panel. The panel has a cavity extending from the backside into the body for receiving a flexible, generally flat, geosynthetic strip. The panel has a plastic pipe (or first cylindrical body) that is situated within the body of the panel in a position so that the plastic pipe is generally horizontal from a front elevation view vantage point of the panel and is generally parallel with the backside of the panel from a top view vantage point of the panel. The plastic pipe extends through the cavity and its ends reside within the concrete panel. The MSE retaining wall further includes a steel rod situated inside of the plastic pipe. The geosynthetic strip extends from backfill soil adjacent to the backside of the panel, into the cavity of the panel, around the elongated body of the plastic pipe, out of the cavity, and into the backfill soil. In another embodiment of the MSE retaining wall, an end of the geosynthetic strip is bound to the panel with a double compression loop arrangement that utilizes an additional solid second plastic rod (or second cylindrical body).

CLAIM OF PRIORTY

The present application claims priority to and the benefit ofprovisional application Ser. No. 63/135,086, filed Jan. 8, 2021, whichis incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is related to pending application no. xx/xxx, xxx,filed on even date herewith, titled “MECHANICALLY STABILIZED EARTH (MSE)RETAINING WALL EMPLOYING ROUND RODS WITH SPACED PULLOUT INHIBITINGSTRUCTURES,” with attorney docket no. 51813-1220, by the same inventorherein, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention generally relates to modular earth retainingwalls, and more particularly, to mechanically stabilized earth (MSE)retaining walls.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Modular earth retaining walls with concrete panels are commonly used forarchitectural and site development applications. Such walls aresubjected to very high pressures exerted by lateral movements of thesoil, temperature and shrinkage effects, and seismic loads.

In many commercial applications, for example, along or supportinghighways, etc., each concrete panel can weigh between two and fivethousand pounds and have a front elevational size of about eight feet inwidth by about five feet, four inches in height.

Oftentimes, the earth retaining walls of this type are reinforced. Morespecifically, a conventional mechanically stabilized earth (MSE)retaining wall with steel reinforcement is typically reinforced withsteel strips or welded wire meshes that extends backward, orperpendicular, from the rear of a concrete panel to reinforce thebackfill soil.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present disclosure provides various embodiments of a mechanicallystabilized earth (MSE) retaining wall that employ, for reinforcement, ageosynthetic strip that attaches to the MSE retaining wall and extendsinto the backfill soil.

One embodiment of the MSE retaining wall of the present disclosures,among others, can be generally summarized as follows. This embodimentenables a geosynthetic strip loop to be adequately secured to a panel.The MSE retaining wall has at least one concrete panel, the panel havinga generally planar body with a frontside, a backside, and a surroundingperipheral edge. The panel has a cavity extending from the backside intothe body for receiving the geosynthetic strip. The panel has a plasticpipe having an elongated body extending between first and second ends.The plastic pipe is situated within the body of the panel in a positionso that the elongated body of the pipe is generally horizontal from afront elevation view vantage point of the panel and is generallyparallel with the backside of the panel from a top view vantage point ofthe panel. The elongated body extends through the cavity. The first andsecond ends reside within the concrete panel. The MSE retaining wallfurther includes a steel rod having an elongated body extending betweenfirst and second ends. The rod is situated inside of the pipe. Aflexible, generally flat, geosynthetic strip extends from backfill soiladjacent to the backside of the panel, into the cavity of the panel,around the elongated body of the plastic pipe, out of the cavity, andinto the backfill soil.

Another embodiment of the MSE retaining wall of the present disclosure,among others, can be summarized as follows. 12. This embodiment enablesa single geosynthetic end of a geosynthetic strip to be adequatelysecured to a panel. The MSE retaining wall has at least one concretepanel, the panel having a generally planar body with a frontside, abackside, and a surrounding peripheral edge. The panel has a cavityextending from the backside into the body. A first cylindrical body, orfirst plastic pipe, has an elongated body extending between first andsecond ends. The first plastic pipe is situated within the body of thepanel in a position so that the elongated body of the pipe is generallyhorizontal from a front elevation vantage point of the panel and isgenerally parallel with the backside of the panel from a top viewvantage point of the panel. The elongated body extends through thecavity. The first and second ends reside within the concrete panel. Asteel rod having an elongated body extends between first and secondends. The rod is situated inside of the pipe.

A second cylindrical body, which can be for example, a solid plasticpipe, has an elongated body extending between first and second ends. Thesecond cylindrical body is situated within the cavity of the panel in aposition so that the elongated body of the second cylindrical body isgenerally horizontal from the front elevation vantage point of the paneland is generally parallel with the backside of the panel as well as thefirst plastic pipe from the top view vantage point of the panel. Aflexible, generally flat, geosynthetic strip extends from backfill soiladjacent to the backside of the panel. The strip extends into the cavitypast the underside of second cylindrical body, then clockwise around thefirst cylindrical body, then clockwise around second cylindrical body,then counterclockwise around the first cylindrical body thereby beingbound under a part of the strip already around the first plastic pipe,and then past the underside of second cylindrical body thereby beingbound under a part of the strip already around second cylindrical body.

Other embodiments, apparatus, systems, methods, features, and advantagesof the present disclosure will be or become apparent to one with skillin the art upon examination of the following drawings and detaileddescription. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods,features, and advantages be included within this description, be withinthe scope of the present disclosure, and be protected by theaccompanying claims. In addition, all optional and preferred featuresand modifications of the described embodiments are usable in all aspectsof the disclosure taught herein. Furthermore, the individual features ofthe dependent claims, as well as all optional and preferred features andmodifications of the described embodiments are combinable andinterchangeable with one another.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Many aspects of the disclosure can be better understood with referenceto the following drawings. The components in the drawings are notnecessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon clearlyillustrating the principles of the present disclosure. Moreover, in thedrawings, like reference numerals designate corresponding partsthroughout the several views.

FIG. 1 is pullout testing report that provides pullout results of theearth reinforcement rod of the present invention spacing the disks at 16inches on center.

FIG. 2 is pullout testing report that provides pullout results of theearth reinforcement rod of the present invention spacing the disks at 12inches on center.

FIG. 3 is pullout testing report that provides pullout results of theearth reinforcement rod of the present invention spacing the disks at 24inches on center which is equivalent in pullout resistance to therectangular bar with raised ribs (RECo) of the prior art (FIG. 6).

FIG. 4 is a side view of an earth reinforcement rod in accordance withthe present invention.

FIG. 5A is a side cross-sectional view of a mechanically stabilizedearth (MSE) retaining wall that employs the earth reinforcement rods ofFIG. 4.

FIG. 5B is a side cross-sectional view of an MSE retaining wall thatemploys geosynthetic strips.

FIG. 6 is a perspective view of a flat rectangular bar with raised ribs(RECO) of the prior art that is employed in a prior art MSE retainingwall.

FIG. 7 is a perspective view of a flat rectangular bar with waves (SINEWALL) of the prior art that is employed in a prior art MSE retainingwall.

FIG. 8 is a perspective view of a welded wire ladder of the prior artthat is employed in a prior art MSE retaining wall.

FIG. 9A is a top view of a washer and nut that can be combined as aflange nut that is used to secure the earth reinforcement rod of FIG. 4to a connector loop of a concrete wall panel.

FIG. 9B is a side view of the washer and nut again which can be combinedas a flange nut of FIG. 9A.

FIG. 10A is a top view of the anti=shear collar that is used to assistwith securing the earth reinforcement rod of FIG. 4 to the connectorloop of a concreate wall panel.

FIG. 10B is a side cross-sectional view of the anti-shear collar of FIG.10A.

FIG. 11 is a side view and a top view of the earth reinforcement rod ofFIG. 4 connected to a connector loop of a concrete wall panel.

FIG. 12 is a front elevation view of one embodiment, among many others,of the MSE retaining wall of FIG. 5A, showing an aesthetically pleasingtop of wall design.

FIG. 13 is a side cross-sectional view of an edging insert in a toppanel of the MSE retaining wall of FIG. 12.

FIG. 14 is a front elevation view of the edging insert in a top panel ofthe MSE retaining wall of FIG. 12.

FIG. 15A is a front elevation view of a first embodiment T1 of the toppanel of the MSE retaining wall of FIG. 12.

FIG. 15B is a front elevation view of a second embodiment T2 of the toppanel of the MSE retaining wall of FIG. 12.

FIG. 15C is a front elevation view of a third embodiment T3 of the toppanel of the MSE retaining wall of FIG. 12.

FIG. 16A is a front elevation view of a prior art MSE retaining wallwith coping skirt at its top.

FIG. 16B is an enlarged side cross-sectional view of the coping skirt ofFIG. 16A.

FIG. 16C is a side cross-sectional view of the MSE retaining wall withcoping skirt of FIG. 16A.

FIG. 17A is a first perspective view of a lifting tool in accordancewith the present disclosure that is designed to lift and move concretepanels (in this case, a top panel) associated with the MSE retainingwall of the present disclosure.

FIG. 17B is a second perspective view of the lifting tool in accordancewith the present disclosure that is designed to lift and move concretepanels (in this case, a panel that is not a top panel) associated withthe MSE retaining wall of the present disclosure.

FIG. 18 is a perspective view of a first prior art embodiment of ageosynthetic loop connection, which is used instead of bars/ladder(FIGS. 6-8) in some embodiments of prior art MSE retaining walls.

FIG. 19 is a perspective view of a second prior art embodiment of ageosynthetic loop connection, which is used instead of bars/ladder(FIGS. 6-8) in some embodiments of prior art MSE retaining walls.

FIG. 20 is a perspective view of a third prior art embodiment of ageosynthetic loop connection, which is used instead of bars/ladders(FIGS. 6-8) in some embodiments of prior art MSE retaining walls.

FIG. 21 is a perspective view of a fourth prior art embodiment of ageosynthetic loop connection, which is used instead of bars/ladder(FIGS. 6-8) in some embodiments of prior art MSE retaining walls.

FIG. 22 is a perspective rear view (without earth soil) of a panel witha first embodiment of a geosynthetic loop connection of the presentdisclosure.

FIG. 23A is a cross-sectional view of the first embodiment of thegeosynthetic loop connection of FIG. 22 to secure a geosynthetic stripto a panel.

FIG. 23B is a top view of the first embodiment of FIG. 22.

FIG. 24A is a cross-sectional view of a panel with a second embodimentof a geosynthetic loop connection of FIG. 22 to secure a singlegeosynthetic end of a geosynthetic strip to a panel.

FIG. 24B is a top view of the second embodiment of FIG. 22.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS Earth Reinforcement Rod

An innovative soil reinforcement rod has been recently invented by theinventor for the earth retaining wall market. The new reinforcement rod1 uses a new geometry of reinforcement, shown in FIG. 4, to be used tocreate a more efficient use of materials, notably steel, in theconstruction of mechanically stabilized earth (MSE) retaining walls 2,shown in FIG. 5A. A conventional MSE retaining wall 2 with steelreinforcement 13 is typically reinforced with steel strips 4 or weldedwire mesh 6, shown in FIGS. 6-8, that extends perpendicular from therear of a concrete panel 14 face to reinforce the backfill soil 15. Thenew earth reinforcement rod 1 was created when realizing that, as shownin FIG. 4, a solid singular round bar 11 with circular disks 3 placedalong the length of the solid round bar 11 would be a more efficient andeffective reinforcement. Capitalizing on passive earth pressure whenpulling the disks 3 through the backfill soil 15, the disks 3 provide ananchoring effect to optimize reinforcement friction or pulloutresistance along the reinforcement length, while minimizing the amountof required steel.

One of the main hinderances of using steel as reinforcement in backfillsoils 15 is the anticipated degradation of the actual steel, or steelloss due to corrosion. A flat bar 4 has the degradation across theentire exposed surface area making a rectangular shape not as efficientas a round shape. The surface area of steel is less when comparing around bar to a flat bar. For instance, a ½ inch round solid bar has 0.2square inch area and an exposed surface area of 1.57 inches. Acomparable rectangular shape that is 1 inch by 2/10 inch has the samesteel cross section area of 0.2 square inches but an exposed surfacearea of 2.4 inches. That equates to the round bar having 1.57/2.40, or65 percent (%), of the exposed surface area when compared to aconventional rectangular shape. As mentioned previously, retaining wallcontractors have also used welded wire mesh of round bars 6 asreinforcement to provide passive pressure by the perpendicular bars 7 toresist pullout or provide reinforcement. The round bars use steel moreefficiently as described above but are not very efficient or effectivewith respect to pullout because of the round shape of the steelperpendicular to the direction of stress 7 being pulled through the soil15 which does not create as much resistance and passive pressure becausethe soil 15 tends to move around the rounded edges 8. Using the earthreinforcement rod 1, the passive earth anchoring is created by the flatdisks 3 being pulled through the soil 15.

Research and extensive testing by the inventor have been used to realizeand confirm the optimum size 9 of disk 3 and spacing 10 along the solidbar length. Testing was performed by running numerous pullout tests in astandard pullout box containing soil by a reputable industry testinglaboratory that specializes in testing and evaluating earthreinforcement materials. The results were compared together, asillustrated in FIGS. 1-3, to determine trends and performance criteriain order to allow a fine tuning or optimization of disk size and spacingto create an ideal friction factor or pullout resistance for earthreinforcement. The results, when compared to traditional rectangularshaped steel reinforcement as well as welded wire fabric, found that thesolid bar with disks along the length to be more effective in performingsoil reinforcement with less steel. The tables in FIGS. 1-3 outline thetest results, clearly showing the optimization and efficiency achievedby the new earth reinforcement rod 1.

With reference to FIG. 4, a preferred embodiment of the earthreinforcement rod 1 is a solid round bar 5 that has pullout inhibitingridges (raised ribs) 11 and pullout inhibiting planar structures in theform of circular disks 3. The solid round bar 5 in the preferredembodiment is conventional rebar, which already has the ridges 11. Eachdisk 3 is preferably ½ inch inside diameter at a minimum or as great as¾ inch inside diameter, depending upon the required strength of thereinforcement and the retaining wall height. The disks 3 are welded ontothe round bar 5 typically as a washer welded to the solid rod. Theoptimal disk size was found to be a diameter 9 of 1 ⅜ inches (1.375inches) for a half inch diameter solid bar disk 3. The preferred spacingof the disks 3 was found by testing to be between 8 and 24 inches oncenter along the length of the solid bar 5.

In some embodiments, the reinforcement rod 1 can be employed without theridges 11 so that the outer surface of the bar 5 is uniformly round. .The raised ridges on the rebar rod help resist pullout of the tensilesteel rod through the soil. However, the passive resistant disks providethe majority of the pullout resistance. Therefore, a smooth steel barwith no raised ridges but with the disks could be used as well,providing a big increase in pullout resistance. The small ridges are abenefit but not required to achieve substantial increase in pulloutresistance in reinforced soil applications due to the disks attached tothe rod.

It should also be noted that the pullout inhibiting structures can beimplemented with different peripheral shapes (other than circular), forexample, square, polygonal, etc. Furthermore, the structure does notnecessarily need to be planar, just have a surface region that runstransverse, or at an angle (e.g., ninety degrees, etc.), to theelongated body of the rod 1.

MSE Connection

The recent invention of the new earth reinforcement rod 1 has thechallenge of how to connect the steel reinforcement rod 1 to the back ofthe concrete panel face 14 of FIG. 5A. Numerous conventional ways ofconnecting steel reinforcement exists in the MSE retaining wall market,but none with the ability to connect with a single reinforcement roundsteel rod 1. The inventor spent much time trying/retrying and alteringdifferent steel connectors, running full scale tensile testing in thelaboratory until one was discovered and realized, and proved the mosteffective. Many connections would work, but ease of installation,verification by an inspector in the field to confirm the complete andcorrect connection has been installed along with providing the strengthrequired of the connection is critical. The inventor discovered that ifan end portion of the reinforcement rod 12 is bent, or turned, andprovided with threads 16, the earth reinforcement rod 1 can be insertedeasily through a connector loop 17 (FIG. 5A) of steel rod that isembedded in and extends from the backside of the concrete panel. Theconnector loop 17 is attached to the panel during casting. A nut withwasher is placed on the threaded end to secure the rod 1 to theconnector loop 17. To reduce the number of separate connecting parts,because a nut and washer would both be needed, a conventional flange nut18 can be utilized, as shown in FIG. 9A and 9B. The flange nut 18 has anut 29 combined with a flange-like washer 30 in a singular unitary partor in two parts mounted together. A flange nut 18 allows an installationcontractor to easily install one piece with the nut exposing threads onthe backside when adequate spinning of the nut was complete. This allowsan easy way for an inspector to confirm a secure connection is complete.

The objective of reinforcement connection to the back of a concretepanel 14 for all MSE (mechanically stabilized earth) retaining wallsystems is to get the highest strength possible in the connection and asclose to the full capacity of the reinforcement, as possible. Ananti-shear collar 19, as shown in FIGS. 10A and 10B, preferably of steeland welded to the rod 1, is used to prevent shear of the connection tolimit the effectiveness of the connection. As illustrated in FIG. 11,the anti-shear collar 19 is placed where the connection would typicallyfail in shear. An shown, the collar 19 has an internal channel 20through which the end region of the rod 1 passes. The channel 20 iscurved so that the curved part of the rod 1 is accommodated. The collar19 also has an external radiused channel 21 that is designed to receiveand rest contiguously against a part of the connector loop 17, asillustrated in FIG. 11. With this configuration, the collar 19effectively thickens up the steel diameter right where the shear wouldoccur, which forces the shear to not occur. Since steel in shear isapproximately half the capacity of steel in tension, shear should beavoided or compensated to force the steel connection into tension withthe full tensile capacity of the reinforcement as the weak link. Theanti-shear collar 19 has shown in full scale connection tests to makethe connection stronger than the reinforcement rod in tension, whichresults in a connection that is generally 100% of the reinforcementtensile capacity, or generally 100% effective.

The earth reinforcement rod 1 can be connected to the connector loop 17in ways other than as previously described in connection with thepreferred embodiment with the flange nut 18 in combination with theanti-shear collar 19. For example, a threaded insert cast into the rearof the concrete panel to allow a threaded rod end of the rod 1 to bescrewed in the back of the panel creating a connection of the round rodto the concrete panel.

As another example embodiment, a double loop of steel rod extending outthe back of the concrete panel can be cast into the rear of the concretepanel, which allows a reinforcement rod 1 with a welded perpendicularpiece of rod forming a “T” shape to be inserted into and behind thedouble loop, thereby connecting the reinforcement rod 1 to the back ofthe panel.

As another example embodiment, the rod 1, in a straight or bentconfiguration, can be welded to the connector loop 17.

As another example embodiment, the rod 1, in bent and threadedconfiguration, can be attached to the connector loop 17 using twoopposing flange nuts 18 on opposing sides of the connector loop 17(i.e., in a sandwich-like configuration).

As another example embodiment, the rod 1, in the bent and threadedconfiguration, could be provided with a metal stop or barrier of somesort that is welded to or otherwise attached to the rod 1 in or near thethreads. The flange nut 18 can then be used to bind and secure theconnector loop 17 along the rod 1 against the stop or barrier.

Top of Panel Geometry/Illimination of Separate Coping Unit

In an attempt to not require a conventional coping unit, unsightlyjoints, and exposed lifting inserts, the present disclosure provides abetter top of wall condition, as shown in FIG. 12, leaving the precastvisible top of the wall 2 to be rectangular with a flat finish insection, creating an aesthetically pleasing top of wall 2.

FIG. 13 is a side cross-sectional view of an edging inset 22 in a toppanel 14 of the MSE retaining wall 2 of FIG. 12. FIG. 14 is a frontelevation view of the edging inset 22 in a top panel of the MSEretaining wall 2 of FIG. 12.

FIG. 15A is a front elevation view of a first embodiment T1 of the toppanel of the MSE retaining wall 2 of FIG. 12. FIG. 15B is a frontelevation view of a second embodiment T2 of the top panel of the MSEretaining wall 2 of FIG. 12. FIG. 15C is a front elevation view of athird embodiment T3 of the top panel of the MSE retaining wall 2 of FIG.12.

Most, if not all, of the current MSE retaining wall suppliers on themarket use a similar separate coping unit 23 shown in FIGS. 16A-16C tohide the unsightly vertical and horizontal joints and lifting insertsthat are located on the top of the MSE concrete panels 14.

The top panel 14 of the present disclosure removes not only theunsightly lap or tongue and groove joint at the top or uneven surface,but also eliminates the lifting inserts. As shown in the prior art wallembodiment of FIG. 15, the lifting inserts 24 and unsightly joinery 25or steps 26 and uneven height panels currently being used in the marketrequire a separate concrete “U” shaped coping unit 23.

Again, the inventor realized that there was a way to provide a clear andprecise rectangular finished top that both pleases aesthetically, butalso serves the function of topping out the retaining wall. Also, thetop panel cast produces the concrete panels 14 at the exact slopegeometry 27 to follow roadway grade behind the wall. In order to removethe required lifting inserts from the top side of the panel 24, aspecialized lifting tool 28 shown in FIGS. 17A and 17B is utilized topick up and move the concrete panels 14.

The lifting tool 28 allows the concrete panel 14 to be hoisted and heldvertical, but also avoids the unsightly lifting inserts 24 (FIG. 16B) atthe top of the uppermost, or top, panel 14. The separate lifting tool 28facilitates this clean top concrete panel system that is trulyinnovative to the current MSE market with no known predecessors havinganything similar. The lifting tool 28 and how it creates a center ofgravity allowing the concrete panel 14 being hoisted into place toremain vertical while being inserted or placed adjacent to otherconcrete panels 14. Also, the lifting tool 28 hooks onto the steellifting loops 31 cast into the back of the concrete panel 14. Thelifting tool 28 can easily be inserted by the contractor using a craneby sliding the lifting tool 28 from the bottom to the top of theconcrete panel 14 thereby engaging the lifting loops 31 with the tool28. This process allows an equipment operator to pick up a concretepanel 14 stacked and lying face down without a separate person makingthe attachments physically to the concrete panel 14, as is customaryusing the conventional lifting inserts 24.

MSE Geosynthetic Loop

Steel reinforcement is not preferred or allowed when using highresistivity backfill soils 15 or high corrosion environments that existon project sites, like near the saltwater coast or roadways that havede-icing salt spread during winter. Geosynthetic reinforcement usinggeosynthetic strips 32 is preferred and used to create the MSE retainingwall 2, as illustrated in FIG. 5B. In the market today, there existsseveral means of connecting flexible geosynthetic strips to the backside of an MSE concrete panel 14.

FIGS. 18-21 show several proprietary connections that exist in themarket today. FIG. 18 is a perspective view of a first prior artembodiment of a geosynthetic loop connection, which is used instead ofbars/ladder (FIGS. 6-8) in some embodiments of prior art MSE retainingwalls. FIG. 19 is a perspective view of a second prior art embodiment ofa geosynthetic loop connection, which is used instead of bars/ladder(FIGS. 6-8) in some embodiments of prior art MSE retaining walls. FIG.20 is a perspective view of a third prior art embodiment of ageosynthetic loop connection, which is used instead of bars/ladders(FIGS. 6-8) in some embodiments of prior art MSE retaining walls. FIG.21 is a perspective view of a fourth prior art embodiment of ageosynthetic loop connection, which is used instead of bars/ladder(FIGS. 6-8) in some embodiments of prior art MSE retaining walls.

All of the foregoing prior art embodiments of a geosynthetic loopconnection in FIGS. 18-21 incorporate a plastic box or sleeve used forinsertion during concrete panel casting, or creation. While all of theforegoing prior art embodiments of the geosynthetic loop connection areeffective and work well, the cost can be high for the separate plasticbox or sleeve, being specifically made for the purpose of creating avoid and providing an opening for a loop connection using a geosyntheticstrip. The overriding requirements of a geosynthetic strip 32 used inMSE applications is to not allow any steel component to be exposed tothe aggressive or corrosive backfill behind the concrete panel.Therefore, any steel used in the connection process must be covered orprotected by a nonmetallic chemically resistance material, typicallyplastic. Also, an acceptable void must be created to loop thegeosynthetic material around a bar or other piece of strong material toobtain an adequate mechanical connection.

FIG. 22 is a perspective rear view (without earth soil) of a panel 14with a first embodiment of a geosynthetic loop connection of the presentdisclosure. FIG. 23A is a cross-sectional view of the first embodimentof the geosynthetic loop connection of FIG. 22. FIG. 23B is a top viewof the first embodiment of FIG. 22.

With reference to FIGS. 22, 23A, and 23B, the MSE geosynthetic loop ofthe present disclosure uses a rubber reusable concrete blockout, to holda piece of non-corrosive plastic (polymer) pipe 33, for example, a PVCpipe, surrounding a piece of rebar 34. The PVC pipe 33 is embedded pastthe rubber insert in the concrete adequately to meet industry standardsto avoid contact with the backfill soil 15 or to have the rebar placedwithin the PVC pipe 33, protected from corrosion. The PVC pipe 33 ispreferably 7 inches in length, an outside diameter (OD) of 1 ¼ inches,and an inside diameter (ID) of ⅞ inches. Further, in the preferredembodiment, the PVC pipe extends into the concreate at both ends atleast 2 inches to ensure that the contained rebar is completely sealedin the concrete. During the concrete panel casting, the PVC pipe 33 istemporarily held by the rubber insert until the concrete is hardened andready to be removed from the concrete panel mold. Then, the rubberinsert is pried loose and removed leaving a void for the geosyntheticstrip 32 to be installed in the field around the rebar 34 encapsulatedby the PVC pipe 33 without the use of a plastic box or sleeve.

The MSE geosynthetic loop connection of the present disclosure providesan economical and easy method to produce the concrete panel 14 with amechanism for installing the geosynthetic strip 32 in the field. Thegeosynthetic strip 32 can be any suitable material, but is typically andpreferably a polyester that is encased in high-density polyethylene(HDPE). A typical width of the strip 32 is 2 inches. This MSEgeosynthetic loop connection is a particular and unique combination of aPVC pipe 33 for protection of the steel (readily available andinexpensive), and a rubber insert to create a void (rubber can be castto various configurations so the ideal geosynthetic strip wrap geometrycan be achieved). A common concrete rebar 34 is placed inside the PVCpipe 33 during the concrete panel casting that provides the strength ofthe connection. The rebar extends well beyond the ends of the PVC pipe33. All three components, when used in this configuration and method wasthe result of numerous trial connections, research, and tensile testingto find the best performing and economical process to connect thegeosynthetic strip to the back of a concrete panel 14.

Going a step further, sometimes, an MSE geosynthetic strip loop cannotbe achieved in the field, and a single geosynthetic strip end must besecured to the back of a concrete panel 14. Many methods have beenpresented in the industry using separate clamps and fasteners. However,tools needed to complete the connection with fasteners or clamps can becumbersome in the field and technically difficult to verify by theinspector that the connection is complete. Looking for asimple-to-install, single strip connection mechanism that is easy toinspect is a big challenge. After much research, trials, and evaluationusing full scale tensile tests by the inventor, a unique, effective,economical, and inspectable connection was realized.

FIG. 24A is a cross-sectional view of a panel with a second embodimentof a geosynthetic loop connection provided by the present disclosure tosecure a single geosynthetic end to a panel 14. FIG. 24B is a top viewof the second embodiment.

As shown in FIGS. 24A and 24B, a double compression loop arrangement canbe used with the geosynthetic strip 32. The first looping part of thedouble compression loop arrangement is formed by the PVC pipe 33 (firstcylindrical body) that houses the rebar 34. A second cylindrical body,hollow or solid, is used to form the second looping part of the doublecompression loop arrangement. This second cylindrical body can be madefrom a variety of materials, for example but not limited to, steel,hardwood (e.g., oak), concrete, etc., provided that the secondcylindrical body has sufficient strength to remain rigid and intactunder the extreme pressure condition. In the preferred embodiment, thesecond cylindrical body is a piece of solid plastic PVC rod, for examplebut preferably, approximately 2 ¼″ long and 1 ¼ inches in outsidediameter. The second solid plastic rod fits loosely into the cavity ofthe panel 14, until the strip 32 is installed, after which the secondplastic rod is bound within the double compression loop arrangement. So,the path of installation of the geosynthetic strip 32 is as follows, asthe strip 32 is inserted and installed. Referring to FIG. 24A, the strip32 extends into the cavity past the underside of solid rod 35, thenclockwise around the pipe 33, then clockwise around pipe 35, thencounterclockwise around pipe 33 (and thereby being bound under a part ofthe strip 32 already around pipe 33) and then past the underside of pipe35 (and thereby being bound under a part of the strip 32 already aroundsolid rod 35). The end of the cavity in the panel 14 is U-shaped from aside view vantage point of the panel, in order to permit easy passage ofthe strip around the plastic pipe during installation of the strip. Theforgoing double loop compression arrangement binds the strip 32, therebyeffectively attaching the strip 32 to the panel 14.

Testing confirmed that 100% of the geosynthetic strip could be achievedwith this connection. Also, the free end 36 of the geosynthetic strip 32exposed assured enough geosynthetic strip 32 was in the connectionallowing inspectors to quickly observe the connection was complete.

Finally, many modifications and other embodiments disclosed herein willcome to mind to one skilled in the art to which the disclosedcompositions and methods pertain having the benefit of the teachingspresented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings.Therefore, it is to be understood that the disclosures are not to belimited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications andother embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of theappended claims. The skilled artisan will recognize many variants andadaptations of the aspects described herein. These variants andadaptations are intended to be included in the teachings of thisdisclosure and to be encompassed by the claims herein.

At least the following is claimed:
 1. A mechanically stabilized earth(MSE) retaining wall, comprising: at least one concrete panel, the panelhaving a generally planar body with a frontside, a backside, and asurrounding peripheral edge, the panel having a cavity extending fromthe backside into the body; a plastic pipe having an elongated bodyextending between first and second ends, the plastic pipe situatedwithin the body of the panel in a position so that the elongated body ofthe pipe is generally horizontal from a front elevation view vantagepoint of the panel and is generally parallel with the backside of thepanel from a top view vantage point of the panel, the elongated bodyextending through the cavity, the first and second ends residing withinthe concrete panel; a steel rod having an elongated body extendingbetween first and second ends, the rod situated inside of the pipe; aflexible, generally flat, geosynthetic strip extending from backfillsoil adjacent to the backside of the panel, into the cavity of thepanel, around the elongated body of the plastic pipe, out of the cavity,and into the backfill soil.
 2. The wall of claim 1, wherein the steelrod is rebar.
 3. The wall of claim 1, wherein the plastic pipe made ofPVC.
 4. The wall of claim 1, further comprising a plurality of theconcrete panels, the plurality including the at least one concretepanel.
 5. The wall of claim 1, wherein an end associated with the cavityin the panel is U-shaped from a side view vantage point of the panel, inorder to permit easy passage of the geosynthetic strip around theplastic pipe during installation of the geosynthetic strip.
 6. The wallof claim 1, further comprising a cylindrical body having an elongatedbody extending between first and second ends, the second cylindricalbody situated within the cavity of the panel in a position so that theelongated body of the cylindrical body is generally horizontal from thefront elevation vantage point of the panel and is generally parallelwith the backside of the panel as well as the plastic pipe from the topview vantage point of the panel, and wherein the geosynthetic stripextends past the underside of the cylindrical body prior to extendingaround the elongated body of the plastic pipe, and wherein the stripextends, prior to extending out of the cavity, clockwise around thecylindrical body, then counterclockwise around the plastic pipe therebybeing bound under a part of the strip already around the plastic pipe,and then past the underside of the cylindrical body thereby being boundunder a part of the strip already around the cylindrical body.
 7. Amechanically stabilized earth (MSE) retaining wall, comprising: at leastone concrete panel, the panel having a generally planar body with afrontside, a backside, and a surrounding peripheral edge, the panelhaving a cavity extending from the backside into the body; a firstcylindrical body, the first cylindrical body being a first plastic pipe,the first plastic pipe having an elongated body extending between firstand second ends, the pipe situated with the body of the panel in aposition so that the elongated body of the pipe is generally horizontalfrom a front elevation vantage point of the panel and is generallyparallel with the backside of the panel from a top view vantage point ofthe panel, the elongated body extending through the cavity, the firstand second ends residing within the concrete panel; a steel rod havingan elongated body extending between first and second ends, the rodsituated inside of the pipe; a second cylindrical body having anelongated body extending between first and second ends, the secondcylindrical body situated within the cavity of the panel in a positionso that the elongated body of the second cylindrical body is generallyhorizontal from the front elevation vantage point of the panel and isgenerally parallel with the backside of the panel as well as the firstcylindrical body from the top view vantage point of the panel; and aflexible, generally flat, geosynthetic strip extending from backfillsoil adjacent to the backside of the panel, the strip extending into thecavity past the underside of second cylindrical body, then clockwisearound the first cylindrical body, then clockwise around secondcylindrical body, then counterclockwise around the first cylindricalbody thereby being bound under a part of the strip already around thefirst cylindrical body, and then past the underside of secondcylindrical body thereby being bound under a part of the strip alreadyaround second cylindrical body.
 8. The wall of claim 7, wherein thesteel rod is rebar.
 9. The wall of claim 7, wherein the plastic pipemade of PVC.
 10. The wall of claim 7, further comprising a plurality ofthe concrete panels, the plurality including the at least one concretepanel.
 11. The wall of claim 7, wherein an end associated with thecavity in the panel is U-shaped from a side view vantage point of thepanel, in order to permit easy passage of the strip around the plasticpipe during installation of the strip.
 12. The wall of claim 7, whereinthe second cylindrical body is a solid plastic rod without a throughway.